Ever since Bill Sali's most unlikely victory last fall, it's been widely presumed there will be a GOP primary in 2008. Sali is deeply unpopular with many Idaho Republicans, as evidenced by his 49.9% vote tally in last year's general election (and his 25% victory in the six-way 2006 GOP primary). His extremist votes will make him increasingly vulnerable as the cycle rolls on.
This week, Iraq War veteran Matt Salisbury became the first Republican to announce he'll run against Sali for the 2008 GOP nod. Salisbury seems to be a better fit for the 1st District than Sali, and the fact he was recognized by George W. Bush at the president's August 2005 Idaho Center appearance probably won't hurt him here as it would in many other CDs. He's young (34) and he seems to have an impressive resume. (Read more here.) He's clearly more moderate on social issues than Sali, telling KTVB that he's a "Lincoln Republican" who believes politicians should stay "out of your bedroom and out of your social mores. ... Idahoans deserve a candidate who doesn't represent social engineering." (Well, we had one last year in Larry Grant.)
But we need to learn much more, about Salisbury's stands. He told the Idaho Press-Tribune, “The greatest issue driving my campaign is the belief that Idaho’s 1st Congressional District deserves a candidate whose singular drive is to independently serve the public trust in such a way that the people know they have a leader in Washington committed to serving his constituents rather than a political career.” (Again, that sounds a lot like Grant, who is a lot more believable saying it at age 61 than Salisbury is at 34.)
Idahoans need to know whether Salisbury would be a rubber stamp for Bush's war policies (we have four of them already), and whether he'd serve the public trust by defending it or dismantling it, as Sali and his Club for Growth cronies seek to do. I'm guessing that Salisbury won't be the last Republican to take on Sali, either. Campaign 2008 is shaping up as a donnybrook in the 1st CD, for both parties. (Randy Stapilus at Ridenbaugh Press says it's the busiest district, by far, in the Northwest. Sounds like a region on the tipping point of change.)
This guy sounds a lot like, well, me. The pro-liberty wing of the Republican Party may not be dead in Idaho, but it's definitely on life support.
Posted by: W. Lane Startin | July 06, 2007 at 04:32 PM
I expect him to be branded a RINO.
Lane, I think we are ALL pro liberty, but that means vastly different things to different people. I'll be eager to see how you flesh out that phrase, but I think the concept of liberty is much messier for federal candidates.
Posted by: Julie in Boise | July 06, 2007 at 05:39 PM
What I meant by that is he seems to have a a more libertarian bent, which is where I'm coming from as well.
Posted by: faustus37 | July 06, 2007 at 08:03 PM
Oop, Salisbury wants to keep the military in Iraq. Too bad. We need someone who has better than a second-grade understanding of foreign policy.
Posted by: faustus37 | July 06, 2007 at 08:23 PM
Speaking of libertarian, think he's more along the line of Ron Paul?
Has anyone noticed the Ron Paul vote signs plastered around town?
Freeway blogging might be just around the corner then![i]
Posted by: Kitt | July 07, 2007 at 12:15 AM
Yes, TONS of Ron Paul signs. Someone's been busy.
And like I said, what is liberty when it comes to foreign policy (or domestic, for that matter)? Is it going into huge debt to bring other nations "democracy" when we can't meet our own needs?
Is it neglecting oil-poor nations beset by genocide to focus on a region that has never been able to solve its own problems?
Is it letting the vice president get away with setting up a shadow government?
Is it neglecting public needs like education, transit, and tax relief for the truly needy to give huge tax breaks to corporations to get them to invest in our state, only to see them screw hundreds of Idaho employees and expand overseas?
Is it voting against restrictions on cockfighting and dogfighting?
Is it one person driving his or her SUV 40 miles roundtrip to work each day while our air quality drops into non-attainment?
Yep, I'm feeling a little cranky right now!
Posted by: Julie Fanselow | July 07, 2007 at 10:23 AM
Ron Paul is this cycle's version of Jerry Brown. His supporters are few, but very hard-core. Personally I find him a bit extreme.
When I refer to myself as "libertarian," I don't mean the Ayn Rand-quoting, tax-protesting, post office-bashing type of libertarian, which is why I'm somewhat loathe to use the term.
What I mean is to keep government out of people's bedrooms like Salisbury wants, but also to pursue intelligent taxation policy (which the Idaho Legislature does anything but), a good education system tailored to individual needs instead of arbitrary test scores, public trust in fields like day care, decent infrastructure, and openness in government in general.
Butch Otter is supposed to be "libertarian." How's he doing on all this? Not too well if you ask me ...
Posted by: W. Lane Startin | July 07, 2007 at 09:39 PM
If there is a positive flip side to Idaho's extremists, it is that they are incapable of hiding their hate. They leave it out in the open for all to see.
Check out the story:
"Racial Threats cause Boise State star Ian Johnson to hire wedding security," ... at:
http://123idaho.blogspot.com/
No need to try to convince me that "all is OK in Idaho. That racial stuff was in the past. What are you black people complaining about?"
***
Best of luck to Larry LaRocco. We need new voices in Boise.
-- Michael
www.michaelrstrickland.com
Posted by: Michael Strickland | July 26, 2007 at 08:45 AM